SARD

Bienvenidos a la Página oficial de la Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana (SARD)

La Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana y su sede se convierten poco a poco en la sombrilla de todos los Arquitectos Dominicanos.

Te invitamos a formar parte integral de la Sociedad, por una mejor arquitectura, por un ejercicio profesional beneficioso para todos y para que puedas participar de los beneficios que aportan los acuerdos de colaboración que hemos realizado con diferentes empresas de la República Dominicana.

La Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana también trabaja en las normas, capacitación, apoyo y reconocimiento que coloca a nuestros miembros, en la República Dominicana y en el extranjero, en el mas alto nivel profesional. La Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana (SARD) es miembro de la Federación Caribeña de Asociaciones de Arquitectos FCAA.

La SARD apuesta por una profesión de ejercicio claro, un futuro lleno de mejor arquitectura, mejores ciudades y un medio ambiente más sano. Una estructura laboral con reglas definidas y ejercicio profesional ético.

La Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana, apoya actividades culturales y académicas relacionadas a la Arquitectura, participa activamente en la organización de la Bienal de Arquitectura de Santo Domingo, BIASD, de la Bienal de Arquitectura del Caribe, BAC y da apoyo a los Encuentros Nacionales de Escuelas de Arquitectura (Enefa), a la Conferencia Latinoamericana de Escuelas y Facultades de Arquitectura , CLEFA.

La SARD es una institución sin fines de lucro, constituida en 1994. Tiene su sede en el antiguo Pabellón de Venezuela, Centro de los Héroes, en la Ciudad de Santo Domingo. La actual directiva está comprometida con la integración de todos los arquitectos y su apertura a toda la comunidad profesional.

Carlos Baez Brugal
Presidente

Nuestra posición sobre las ordenanzas propuestas por el ADN

Exposición de la SARD en las vistas públicas Del Ayuntamiento del Distrito Nacional efectuadas el 22 agosto 2018

Noticias...

REUNION SOBRE BIASD Y BAC

Reunion en el MAM sobre la organizacion de la Bienal Internacional de Arquitectura de Santo Domingo, BIASD, y la Bienal de Arquitectura del Caribe, BAC.

Q&A: Renzo Piano

Photography by Paul Clemence

There's a reason why Renzo Piano is known as the master of museum design. The architect has designed 25 of them, 14 in the U.S. alone. Few architects understand as well as Piano—along with his practice, the Renzo Piano Building Workshop (RPBW)—what board directors, curators, and even the visiting public needs and wants in a cultural institution like a museum. When I spoke with Donna de Salvo, chief curator of the Whitney Museum of American Art, whose new downtown digs were authored by RPBW she remarked on the how the curators' input was often incorporated into the final building design. “Our curators and the architects had an ongoing dialogue throughout the design of this building," de Salvo says. "The physical needs of the art were a priority for Renzo and his team, down to the most seemingly minute detail. Our curatorial voice was central to the discussion and has given us a terrifically dynamic building, a uniquely responsive array of spaces for art.”

But what often goes unmentioned is how well Piano's buildings, particularly his museums, connect to their surroundings. The buildings not only perform well, but they integrate themselves into the life of the city, as if they have always been there. From Beaubourg to The New York Times Building, they fully embrace the space and energy of their urban contexts. Now, as two of his newest and very high-profile museum projects near completion—the renovation and expansion of the Harvard Art Museums (due to open this Fall) and the Whitney Museum of Art (expected to be in use by Spring 2015)—I had a chance to meet with Piano at his Meatpacking District office to talk about the creative process, criticisms, contemporary architecture, and “flying” buildings.

Paul Clemence: I look around your office and models are everywhere! From miniatures of entire buildings to blown-up structural details. Considering the integration of 3-D modeling software in architectural practice over the last decade, are models still essential to the preliminary design process?

Renzo Piano: Doing one of these rough models is the same as sketching. The model is three-dimensional version of a sketch. With the computer you need to tell it exactly what to do; where to start, where to stop. When I am doing the sketch, I don’t have to tell the sketch where to start, where to end. It’s instinctive. Sketching, like the model, has the quality of imperfection. Neither has to be precise. It gives you freedom. It gives you the possibility to change. The computer is perfect in the moment when you cannot be perfect. Making models and sketches is very important in this early part of the process, because in the beginning it is never precise—if you have to be precise you can get trapped in the shape, in the form. And you have to remember that the model is just a fragment—the only place where it all comes together is the mind, even with things like proportion and scale. One of the biggest mistakes an architect can make is to get scale wrong.

PC: Then there is a very long road, many years, from imagining a design in your head to it becoming built reality. What are your thoughts on that process, of the idea only coming together in the real world so many years later?

RP: That’s a struggle! Architecture relies on long time, always, both in construction and in recognition. Architecture is not something that is typically recognized or understood the first day. Architecture is not fashion. I have nothing against fashion, but I mean that fashion happens more suddenly, faster. Architecture takes longer to be understood, like cities, like rivers, like forests—it takes time! A building can take a long time to be understood and loved. With Beaubourg [the colloquial name for the Centre Pompidou in Paris] it was like that—there was a lot of negative reaction when it first opened. It took the Centre Pompidou 10-15 years to be accepted by the city. Sometimes it takes less. The handicap of a new museum is just that, that it's “new.” It has not yet gone through the ritual of day-to-day life in the city. It takes time for a building to be loved and adopted by the city. Whether it is a theatre, university, museum, or a church, the building has to become part of the daily life of the city to be accepted.

PC: A new building fundamentally brings change to a city or a part of a city, and that is not always easy to accept or even understand.

RP: As an architect, if you are lucky enough, good enough to find yourself in the right place at the right time, you witness by what you are doing a change and that is never easy, because people don’t like change. The architect is interpreting that change. The art of living, staying together, is in constant change. As an architect you can not be so arrogant to believe you made that change. But if you spend your time observing society and community then you become the witness to the change, an interpreter of the change.

PC: One of your latest projects is the expansion of the Harvard Art Museums, which are located just next to the Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts (Le Corbusier’s only building in America). Your plan included bringing the Fogg Museum, the Busch-Reisinger Museum, and the Arthur M. Sackler Museum all under one single structure. It's an interesting approach and a complex that will change the atmosphere of Harvard's campus. More broadly, how do you see this project affecting the wider Cambridge community?

RP: Opening the existing structure to the public square to the passage of people, creating a ground floor that is totally public—those were the goals of the project. It will bring change to the spirit of the relationship between Harvard and the Cambridge community. Philosophy and history are part of where you start a project from and in the Harvard project, you can’t forget the history of the social relationship between Harvard and that community. The connection has not been fine for a long time, and you have to find a way that could help with that.

PC: What was the big opportunity here? What about the site and the existing building fabric led you to your solution?

RP: I was surprised to find a piece of the Montepulciano inside. [Piano refers to the Fogg Museum's courtyard, which is modeled on a fifteenth-century facade of a canon house in Montepulciano, Italy.] Usually when this [the replica of an older, historic typology or detail] is done, it can be a bit kitsch, but in this case it was done very well, in the right scale. I immediately thought that should become the center of the new plan, to make it the center of gravity of the project. We wanted to make the museum, which is also a study and art center, a real public building. We wanted to keep the ground floor totally public and open, so the people that live in the area and people on campus can enter and pass through it without any intimidation. It’s a gesture of openness, accessibility, of sharing.

PC: Change also is a theme at the Whitney project, which is moving downtown.

RP: Yes, it’s moving from uptown to downtown, back to where the institution had originated [in Greenwich Village] and to a place more similar in spirit to the institution's beginnings.

PC: Some people have said that the northern façade is not looking as exciting at it could be, that it does not make a enough of a gesture towards the city. How do you respond to that?

RP: First, we have to wait and see, the building is not ready yet, of course. A building like this is like a meteorite, but a gentle one. It does not destroy anything—actually it uplifts. But it lands, and it is something new there. People should wait for the building to be finished and see.

PC: Do you feel you have learned anything from criticism?

RP: It’s a funny thing—as an architect you have to keep focus; but you also have to have to listen. And to recognize the good voices from the bad voices, and that is very difficult because sometimes the important voices are hard to hear. As an architect you are always learning—it’s a long, long apprenticeship! It’s a long path for an architect. You need to be good in so many things, in poetry, in building, as a civic person.

PC: On that note, most of your projects—Beaubourg, the Nasher Sculpture Center, The New York Times Building, the Harvard Art Museums, and the Whitney—they all connect to the city grid in a very special way.

RP: But that’s because I am Italian. The city is under your skin—as an Italian you grow up with this idea that cities are places where buildings talk to each other. There’s a dialogue between the building and the street. It’s about accessibility, it’s about civic life. An urban person is a person that knows how to behave with civility, how to share, how to be accessible. A building should be like that. It should talk to the city, talk to the people. Buildings like this allow people to share experiences together, to enjoy and share life. Speaking together is a form of acceptance and the beginning of tolerance, which is the secret of civic life.

PC: And how do your buildings accomplish that?

RP: All the buildings you mentioned—they “fly." They are rooted, but they lift up, above the ground and that lets light to come under and inside and allow the ritual of the city life to merge with the ritual of the building life. By lifting the building, the ground floor becomes almost a continuation of the public realm. You leave space beneath it for life to happen.

PC: What excites you today about architecture?

RP: It is never the same. Every day is a new adventure. Every new project is a new adventure. It feels like being Robinson Crusoe landing in a different island all the time, learning, and discovering new things. It’s never ending.

You have to accept the dialogue. But accepting a dialogue doesn’t mean you have to do what people tell you to do, but you have to understand. This is part of the essence of our job. A good building is always telling a story. There’s a narrative. That’s why writing or making a picture or being an architect is not that different. You need a good story and good writing. You need to have both.
--
Fuente:
http://www.metropolismag.com/Point-of-View/July-2014/Q-A-Architect-Renzo...

SARD firmara acuerdo con CEIRD

La Sociedad de Arquitectos de la Republica Dominicana, firmara acuerdo que con el CENTRO DE EXPORTACIÓN E INVERSIÓN DE LA REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA (CEI-RD), el cual ha sido elaborado por el Departamento de Consultoría Jurídica de dicha institucion y la presidencia de la SARD.
En la actividad se firmara el acuerdo , ademas contara con una ponencia del Director de la CEIRD , DR. JEAN ALAIN RODRÍGUEZ , sobre el Proyecto de " VENTANILLA UNICA " ,esta programada para el dia 20 del mes de Julio 2014, e invitamos a todos los miembros de la SARD a este importante evento.
Este acuerdo nos dara a la sociedad multiples beneficios y facilidades en los procesos de aprobacion de los proyectos con la colaboracion del personal de CEIRD.

Agradeciendo colaboración
Bienvenido Pantaleon H.

Cómo Ser Miembro

Para tu conocimiento, si quieres ser parte de nuestra institución y empezar a ser un referente, los requisitos básicos son los siguientes...

Carnet Distintivo SARD

Es un instrumento diseñado para los miembros de la SARD que les servira para su identificación en todos los eventos oficiales que genere la SARD y por consiguiente ademas sera su herramienta para tener participación en todas las asambleas, tanto generales como ordinarias y con el uso de este podran tener derecho al voto.
Además es un instrumento que nos vincula a una institución con prestigio y que cada día es más representativa de la clase a la que orgullosamente pertenecemos.
Hoy en día se hace indispensable el tener una relación que nos aglutine y nos beneficie, por lo que ademas de todos los beneficios de ser miembro, tambien se ha diseñado lo que hemos denominado como el valor agregado de tener este documento Carnet/SARD, lo cual consiste inicialmente en el aceso a unas sesenta (60) instituciones de alto prestigio y aumentando.
Estas son suplidores de bienes y servicios vinculados a nuestro que hacer diario y otros a nuestra vida como ciudadanos, y estos han deseado tener una relación con nuestra institución a largo plazo y no una relación de ocasión y eventual. Por lo que este Carnet/SARD nos dara acceso a un sin número de descuentos, ofertas y mas, que estas instituciones han elaborado para nosotros, por lo que todos vamos a querer hacer negocios con estos suplidores de bienes y servicios por que el vínculo será mas que un simple negocio, será una relación de apoyo mutuo a largo plazo.

Estos bienes incluyen:
Materiales de construcción / Materiales de terminación / Materiales industrializados / Hormigones / Maderas / Acero / Pinturas / Iluminación Revistas / Pasajes Aereos / Estadía en hoteles / Comunicaciones,
Además de medicamentos, seguros, gomas, vestimentas, etc…

Estos servicios incluyen:
Servicios de emergencias, Legales, Fiscales, Financieros, Aduanales, Fotográficos, Medicos, Odontológicos, Impresión de Planos, Educación continuada, Jardineria, Floristerias, Catering, Gimnasios, Papelerias, etc.

NUEVA DIRECTIVA SARD 2014-2017

El arquitecto Ramón Bienvenido Pantaleón Hernández es el nuevo Presidente de la Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana. Tras unas elecciones matizadas por su pulcra organización, realizadas en el antiguo Pabellón de Venezuela en la “Feria de la Paz y Confraternidad del Mundo Libre”, impresionante inmueble que sufre los rigores de su gradual deterioro, no obstante los esfuerzos por mantenerlo atractivo, lo cual logra por su simple presencia formal y estructural, la Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana, fundada en 1994 y con sede en ese icónico lugar, se apresta a lanzar un programa buscando unir a la clase profesional relacionada con la arquitectura, para la cual, tiene esbozado un plan económico y cultural, de acercamientos y fortalecimiento social con el extenso empresariado privado y quienes laboren en el sector público.

Una significativa cantidad de profesionales jóvenes y adultos, se dio cita la tarde del jueves 10 de abril 2014, en el antiguo Pabellón del Centro de los Héroes, haciéndose notar una entusiasta integridad entre dicha asistencia, en donde fue notable la participación de un profesorado y numerosos egresados de por lo menos cinco universidades locales, dentro de las cuales se imparten los conocimientos de arquitectura.

Al final del conteo de votos, el arquitecto Pantaleón Hernández, el arquitecto Elmer Gonzalez y el Arquitecto Omar Rancier agradecieron el respaldo de quienes conforman la plancha ganadora, el de los organizadores del certamen de votación, en las personas de la Comisión Electoral que formara la saliente Directiva, y de quienes asistieron a fortalecer la institucionalidad votando en dichas elecciones.

En lo inmediato diversas directrices han de encauzarse desde la nueva gestión, siendo una de ellas, la recuperación física del edificio que aloja a la entidad, cedido en 1995 por la Embajada de Venezuela, tras acuerdos oficiosos con el superior gobierno dominicano, asi como el desarrollo de el PDEI 2014-2017 en beneficio de la clase profesional de la Arquitectura dominicana.

Subscribe to Sociedad de Arquitectos de la República Dominicana RSS